Public BetaThe Nigeria Papers™ is in public beta. Source records are being expanded and verified continuously. Verified facts, documented claims, allegations, and under-review material are labeled separately. Methodology →
Headquarters of Nigeria's Federal Ministry of Finance
Contract dossier · documented case

Dasuki / ONSA $2.1bn arms procurement funds (Dasukigate)

📷 Naziftm, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0
Public BetaUnder Review

This section is being converted from structural scaffolding into verified source-backed records. Treat unsourced fields as under review until each row displays a source link and confidence label. See our evidence standards and source-work roadmap.

under investigationDocumented Claim
Amount
$2.10bn — $2.1bn foreign-currency component; committee also found N643.8bn extra-budgetary naira spending (Wikipedia, citing presidential investigations committee interim report)
Awarding agency
Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA)
Contractor
unverified — funds disbursed to multiple individuals and companies; no single contractor
Date
2012–2015 (disbursement period under NSA Sambo Dasuki)
Scope
Federal

What happened

A presidential investigations committee on arms procurement under the Goodluck Jonathan administration reported that about $2.1bn (and N643.8bn extra-budgetary naira spending) was disbursed through the Office of the National Security Adviser under Sambo Dasuki, allegedly for arms to fight Boko Haram, but was not spent for that purpose. The EFCC alleged part of the funds was diverted to political campaigns and private beneficiaries. Dasuki, who has consistently denied wrongdoing, is still facing a N33.2bn fraud trial before the FCT High Court in Abuja that began over a decade ago and was re-arraigned in 2025, with prosecution witnesses still testifying as of early 2026.

Red flags

Analytical observations against standard procurement-integrity patterns — not accusations.

🚩 Extra-budgetary spending

Analytical observation: the presidential committee found spending of about N643.8bn plus $2.2bn outside the approved budget framework. Bypassing appropriation is a classic procurement-integrity red flag (Wikipedia, citing committee report).

🚩 Payments to entities with little or no defence-procurement link

Analytical observation: EFCC alleged large payments to politicians, officials and companies with little or no link to defence procurement; a 2026 trial witness traced ONSA funds to private firms such as Acacia Holdings Ltd (theyesng.com, Jan 2026). Allegation attributed to EFCC; not proven.

🚩 Decade-long unresolved trial

Analytical observation: despite headline charges since 2015, the trial has lasted over a decade with re-arraignment and stalled progress — a pattern that, in procurement research, signals enforcement risk rather than resolution (nggossips.com, Apr 2026).

Sources

🕳️ Keep digging

A rabbit hole where every click reveals deeper connected corruption. Every thread connects — follow one.

⬡ Citizen·0 pts·depth 0/10
⬡ Citizen·0 pts·depth 0/10